We are not ready for what’s coming.
In the theatre of democratic politics, the spotlight often lands on personalities. Malta’s current leadership contest within the Opposition is no exception. But when contenders perform primarily for a party audience, rather than a national future, the real work of politics is left undone. Policy is sidelined for positioning. Vision is replaced by validation. And the urgent questions facing the country remain unanswered, not out of malice or neglect, but because the performance demands a different script.
This post is not about the individuals seeking to lead. It is about the world they will be tasked with navigating and the kind of leadership this country requires.
Indeed the real contest is not for the PN leadership. It is for Malta’s future under the gravitational pull of a new economic force: Artificial Intelligence. In the 20th century, politics was shaped by the classical triad of land, labour, and capital. In the 21st, those have been displaced by a single overriding infrastructure: attention, as shaped by digital technology.
The Politics That Lost a Generation
To understand the moral vacuum at the heart of modern politics, consider the lived experience of Gen Z: roughly 97,000 individuals in Malta born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s. This is a generation shaped less by ideology and more by algorithms. They inhabit an economy where attention, not productivity, generates capital (a recent study showed that 57% of Gen Zs want to pursue a career path as a social media influencer). At the same time, they live under the looming threat that the jobs they trained for will be rendered obsolete by automation. AI does not simply disrupt work; it rewrites the social contract that once tethered effort to reward, contribution to dignity, and education to opportunity.
And so: nihilism sets in. Not because young people are lazy, but because their efforts return no perceptible reward. Education is expensive and yields diminishing returns. Work is precarious. Housing is entirely unaffordable. Truth is diluted. Meaning is optional. This is not just an economic crisis but a political one. Gen Z is checking out, and they are doing so not with protest, but with silence. Mary Grace Vella, in a compelling academic analysis, describes this as an emerging anti-politics culture. And the evidence is mounting: in May, Eurostat found that young people in Malta (aged 16–29) are less likely to engage in online civic or political activity than their older peers: an inversion of the trend seen across nearly every other EU country.
This is the cohort most attuned to the contradictions of our time: and yet most absent from formal political life. They are fluent in systems, cynical of institutions, and alert to performative rhetoric. When politics reduces itself to tribal point-scoring, they do not fight back. They simply log off. And this withdrawal is something our political leaders neither see nor understand, often because their rhetoric alienates more than it nurtures. They speak in the vocabulary of loyalty and legacy, when what is needed is a politics of relevance, purpose, and future-making. Until that changes, Gen Z will continue to turn away because the system seems structured to ignore them.
If the political class remains transfixed by its own shadow play, obsessed with performance-politics, it will find itself governing a country that no longer believes governance matters.
AI and the Moral Consequences of Inaction
Artificial Intelligence is not merely an innovation; it is a redistribution of agency. And it is moving faster than our institutions can respond. So as we are being catapulted into this AI future, our political leadership should not be silent.
No serious policy debate is taking place about how Malta will protect entry-level jobs in an AI economy. No inspired vision exists for how we will re-structure education or what a post-labour tax system should look like.
A future Opposition leader cannot be a factional broker, but a constructor of vision. Not just reactive, but regenerative.
The public sphere cannot remain a slot machine for emotional outrage about traffic, roadworks, construction and power-cuts. Malta deserves a politics where attention is strategically raised, but also wisely spent. We need leaders who can drive reform. Not spectacle, but substance.
The New Mandate
Let us not measure candidates by their ability to unify a party machine. Let us measure them by their willingness to re-engineer the machine entirely. Let us ask them: what is your policy on AI in the workforce? What will you do to restore meaning in a generation on the brink of existential fatigue? Will you champion a digital public service that empowers rather than manipulates?
How will you rebalance attention between viral politics and vital reforms, between the spectacle and the scaffolding of the state?
Will you commit to a politics of moral courage rather than convenience? Will you prioritise policy over personality, and justice over inter-party loyalty? Will you treat attention not as a spotlight to bask in, but as a currency to be invested: wisely, justly, and with purpose?
These are not academic questions. They are the foundations of credible leadership. If no contender can answer them, then the real vacancy is not in the Opposition: but in the moral imagination of our politics.
The attention economy has already rewritten the rules of influence. The question is whether our politics will remain a museum of 20th-century thinking, or rise to meet the demands of a new world. In this moment, the greatest political act is not to win attention, but to deserve it. It is not who leads the party; but who dares to lead and re-build through uncertainty… who can speak to a generation losing faith not just in politicians, but in the very premise of politics.
We are no longer living in an age where managing the present is enough. We need leaders who can imagine the future, and then take responsibility for building it. The crises we face; of meaning, of work, of truth, are not accidental. They are the result of choices deferred, futures postponed, short-term thinking and a politics emptied of moral ambition.
In this new era, the first duty of leadership is not to be seen.
It is to see clearly and act accordingly.
No Comments